Computes average marginal effects (AME) for numeric covariates in the
mean or precision submodel of a fitted "brs" object.
Arguments
- object
A fitted
"brs"object.- newdata
Optional data frame for evaluation; defaults to the data used in fitting.
- model
Character;
"mean"(default) or"precision".- type
Character prediction scale:
"response"(default) or"link".- variables
Optional character vector of covariate names. Defaults to all numeric covariates in the selected submodel.
- h
Finite-difference step for non-binary numeric covariates.
- interval
Logical; compute interval estimates via simulation.
- level
Confidence level for interval estimates.
- n_sim
Number of parameter draws when
interval = TRUE.- keep_draws
Logical; if
TRUEandinterval = TRUE, stores AME simulation draws in attribute"ame_draws".
Value
A data frame with one row per variable and columns:
variable, ame, std.error, ci.lower,
ci.upper, model, type, and n.
The returned object has class "brs_marginaleffects" and
attributes with analysis metadata.
Details
AMEs are computed by finite differences on predictions: $$ \mathrm{AME}_j = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\hat{g}_i(x_{ij} + h) - \hat{g}_i(x_{ij})}{h}, $$ where \(\hat{g}_i\) is the selected prediction scale.
For binary covariates coded as 0/1, the effect is computed as the
average discrete difference \(\hat{g}(x_j=1)-\hat{g}(x_j=0)\).
If interval = TRUE, uncertainty is approximated by asymptotic
parameter simulation from \(\mathcal{N}(\hat{\theta}, \hat{V})\).
References
Lopes, J. E. (2023). Modelos de regressao beta para dados de escala. Master's dissertation, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba. URI: https://hdl.handle.net/1884/86624.
Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., and French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care and Research, 63(S11), S240-S252. doi:10.1002/acr.20543
Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Haugen, D. F., et al. (2011). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(6), 1073-1093. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
Examples
# \donttest{
dat <- data.frame(
y = c(
0, 5, 20, 50, 75, 90, 100, 30, 60, 45,
10, 40, 55, 70, 85, 25, 35, 65, 80, 15
),
x1 = rep(c(1, 2), 10),
x2 = rep(c(0, 0, 1, 1), 5)
)
prep <- brs_prep(dat, ncuts = 100)
#> brs_prep: n = 20 | exact = 0, left = 1, right = 1, interval = 18
fit <- brs(y ~ x1, data = prep)
brs_marginaleffects(fit, model = "mean", type = "response")
#> variable ame std.error ci.lower ci.upper model type n
#> 1 x1 -0.0548085 0.1306531 -0.3009406 0.206986 mean response 20
# }
